Container trucking services, long-distance (TL) · Tennessee

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC

Memphis, TN · ~93 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Container trucking services, long-distance (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC: 2.4 TCR = 52% of Container trucking services, long-distance (TL) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC safety composite

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2018→2020

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC injury rate improved

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC's TCR fell 3.1 from 4.7 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Memphis, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 52% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #44/128
  • PHOTO SAV Transportation G…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAV Transportation Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC averages 2.4 TCR (52% of the Container trucking services, long-distance (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC falls in its industry

3,252 Container trucking services, l establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 128 Container trucking services, l employers in Tennessee.

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC (93 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC
Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC (93 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC has more employees than the Container trucking services, long-distan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 4.7 4.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · TN · Memphis

3,252 Container trucking services, long-distance (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 1,330 employers in Memphis, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAV Transportation Group 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maxton, NC - 2120 Hwy 71 N 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MLI LTL 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moeller Trucking, Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aerostar SES LLC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Healthcare 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Constructors, Inc 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acuff Enterprises, Inc 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx 2903 SPRANKLE DR 12,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 381940311 9,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Residential Services 5,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Jude Children's Research Hospital 5,599 FTE
NAT-TCR UNIT855 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 40 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carriage House 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Many Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Etta Israel Center - Corp 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winnebago Industries - Oregon 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bush Industries, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE South 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.