General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Minnesota

SAV Transportation Group

Coon Rapids, MN · ~127 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SAV Transportation Group runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

SAV Transportation Group: 2.4 TCR = 52% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SAV Transportation Group safety composite

SAV Transportation Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

SAV Transportation Group held a steady TCR band

SAV Transportation Group's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.7 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Coon Rapids, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 52% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #23/74
  • PHOTO Maxton, NC - 2120 Hw…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~127 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maxton, NC - 2120 Hwy 71 N (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

SAV Transportation Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SAV Transportation Group averages 2.4 TCR (52% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SAV Transportation Group TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 4.5

Where SAV Transportation Group falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 74 General freight trucking, long employers in Minnesota.

SAV Transportation Group (127 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate SAV Transportation Group
SAV Transportation Group (127 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

SAV Transportation Group has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2021 6.1 3.1 2 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 6 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · MN · Coon Rapids

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 155 employers in Coon Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maxton, NC - 2120 Hwy 71 N 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MLI LTL 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moeller Trucking, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Armstrong Transportation & Trailers, LLC 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FERTILE BELTRAMI SCHOOL DISTRICT 599 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brin Glass Service / Contract 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE PETERSON SHEET METAL INC 127 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sonus Interiors 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital 2,851 FTE
CITY-NEAR rms Company 1,058 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coon Rapids Customer Exp Ctr 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Coon Rapids 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Tarsco Bolted Tank 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Underwood Electric Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RJR Technologies Phoenix Facility 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR E&K of Kansas City, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Acres Healthcare Center 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bountiful, UT 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gooding Heifer Ranch 127 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armstrong & Aceves Roofing, Inc. 127 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.