Tools and accessories for machine tools manufacturing · Michigan

Arobotech Systems, Inc.

Madison Heights, MI · ~24 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arobotech Systems, Inc. runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tools and accessories for machine tools manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Arobotech Systems, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Tools and accessories for machine tools manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arobotech Systems, Inc. safety composite

Arobotech Systems, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2020→2024

Arobotech Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Arobotech Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333515 · Madison Heights, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/40
  • PHOTO Sandvik Coromant PU …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Arobotech Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arobotech Systems, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Tools and accessories for machine tools manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arobotech Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2020=4.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Arobotech Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

221 Tools and accessories for mach establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 40 Tools and accessories for mach employers in Michigan.

Arobotech Systems, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Arobotech Systems, Inc.
Arobotech Systems, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Arobotech Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Tools and accessories for machine tools median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.2 4.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333515 · MI · Madison Heights

221 Tools and accessories for machine tools manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Madison Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vortex Tool Company, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RICHARDS MICRO-TOOL 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaVergne 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Medina Dairy, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sturgis 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE CE Innovation Center 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Filtration and Meter Shop 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR MADISON HEIGHTS (MIMAD) 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIMAD - MADISON HEIGHTS 749 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET183 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET183 ASCENSION MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSP - MADISON HEIGHTS 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Dolphin Innovations, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Varn International, A Flint Group Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR C. S. Humphrey & Company, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Control Service Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Related Hybrid Companies LLC 50 Hudson Yards 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Related Management Company LP Fifteen Fifty 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Related Management Company LP Ocean Park Apartments 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.