Inserts, cutting tool, manufacturing · South Carolina

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster

Westminster, SC · ~279 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Inserts, cutting tool, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster: 0.9 TCR = 26% of Inserts, cutting tool, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster safety composite

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster held a steady TCR band

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333515 · Westminster, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Vortex Tool Company,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~279 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vortex Tool Company, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster averages 0.9 TCR (26% of the Inserts, cutting tool, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster falls in its industry

221 Inserts, cutting tool, manufac establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Inserts, cutting tool, manufac employers in South Carolina.

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster (279 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster
Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster (279 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Sandvik Coromant PU Westminster has more employees than the Inserts, cutting tool, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2023 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2021 1.2 0.8 3 0 0
2020 1.2 0.0 2 1 0
2019 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 2 2 0
2017 0.7 0.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333515 · SC · Westminster

221 Inserts, cutting tool, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 14 employers in Westminster, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vortex Tool Company, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RICHARDS MICRO-TOOL 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arobotech Systems, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CB Manufacturing & Sales Co., Inc. 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenville - 5024 Pelham Road 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hengst 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPARTANBURG SC 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE NaturChem, Inc. 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lift Technologies, Inc. 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulbrich Specialty Wire Products 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baxter Manufacturing LLC 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horton- Oconee County 95 FTE
NAT-TCR BBA 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. Waimea 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR O&M Indiana Harbor 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Middletown Facility 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE B & M Precision 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE DURANGO 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rocky Mount 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles Police Department, Harbor Division 279 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.