Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Ohio

Arsco Custom Metals LLC

Cincinnati, OH · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Arsco Custom Metals LLC runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Arsco Custom Metals LLC: 7.8 TCR = 236% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Arsco Custom Metals LLC safety composite

Arsco Custom Metals LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.8

2019→2024

Arsco Custom Metals LLC injury rate improved

Arsco Custom Metals LLC's TCR fell 16.8 from 16.8 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 22.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=16.8 · 2020=22.4 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 236% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #80/90
  • PHOTO Manufacturing
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Arsco Custom Metals LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Arsco Custom Metals LLC averages 7.8 TCR (236% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Arsco Custom Metals LLC TCR series: 2019=16.8 · 2020=22.4 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Arsco Custom Metals LLC falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 90 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Ohio.

Arsco Custom Metals LLC (34 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Arsco Custom Metals LLC
Arsco Custom Metals LLC (34 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Arsco Custom Metals LLC has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 22.4 8.9 5 0 0
2019 16.8 13.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · OH · Cincinnati

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manufacturing 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CMP-AMS NY 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TXSX 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Uni-Structures, Inc. 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bauman Orchards Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millcreek Gardens LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meadow View Growers, Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ayers farms inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Oakmont of Simi Valley 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Augustine Landing 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harry Meyering Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cadillac Coffee Co. Manufacturing & Corporate Office & Distribution 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Monogram Aerospace Fasteners AZ 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Family Care Network, PLLC - Ferndale Family Medical Center 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE IG Design Group Americas, Inc. - Maynard, MN 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunnyside Danville 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.