Other Direct Selling Establishments · Michigan

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi

Canton, MI · ~53 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Other Direct Selling Establishments workplace, earning a grade C.

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi: 2.8 TCR = 81% of Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi safety composite

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi: 4.9 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.21× in 2024

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi's TCR rose 1.2 from 4.9 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454390 · Canton, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 81% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO AMERICOLD - COMPTON …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AMERICOLD - COMPTON CA - CB (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi averages 2.8 TCR (81% of the Other Direct Selling Establishments BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.4

Where Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi falls in its industry

212 Other Direct Selling Establish establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Other Direct Selling Establish employers in Michigan.

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi (53 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi
Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi (53 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Artic Cold Storage - Canton Mi has more employees than the Other Direct Selling Establishments median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2018 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2017 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 4.9 4.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454390 · MI · Canton

212 Other Direct Selling Establishments employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 122 employers in Canton, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AMERICOLD - COMPTON CA - CB 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2077-US DD NW BRKLYN QUEENS BRANCH 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2077-US DD NW DAVENPORT BRANCH 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Coffee - New Orleans Sales 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE EDL- Lansing Office 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Energy - Newaygo 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Livonia 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Contractors, Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6801 Headquarters 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Detroit 397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DDT9 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3476 341 FTE
NAT-TCR Lighthouse Acute Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Field Services 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Inland Flexo, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Materion - Lorain 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jeff Antczak Trucking 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Suburban Utility District 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Connecticut Zoological Society 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE RRSC Buffalo 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.