Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Michigan

Bickford of Midland

Midland, MI · ~53 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bickford of Midland runs at 605% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bickford of Midland: 23.0 TCR = 605% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bickford of Midland safety composite

Bickford of Midland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 30.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bickford of Midland: 34.1 → 67.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 69.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.82× in 2021

Bickford of Midland's TCR rose 33.4 from 34.1 in 2016 to 67.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 69.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Midland, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.0 · 605% of ind

  • DART 41.8 DART
  • RANK #95/97
  • PHOTO United Methodist Hom…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: United Methodist Homes Elizabeth Church Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Bickford of Midland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bickford of Midland averages 23.0 TCR (605% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bickford of Midland TCR series: 2016=34.1 · 2018=69.5 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=30.5 · 2021=67.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Bickford of Midland falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 97 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Bickford of Midland (53 employees, TCR 23.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bickford of Midland
Bickford of Midland (53 employees, TCR 23.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bickford of Midland has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 67.5 41.8 9 12 0
2020 30.5 30.5 1 6 0
2019 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 69.5 49.6 13 1 0
2016 34.1 24.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MI · Midland

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 135 employers in Midland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR United Methodist Homes Elizabeth Church Campus 23.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Springs Living at Home 23.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Greenwood 23.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Hermantown I 22.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE EDL- Lansing Office 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Energy - Newaygo 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Livonia 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Commercial Contractors, Inc. 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Chemical - Great Lakes Bay Region Corporate Facilities 3,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR MyMichigan Medical Center Midland 2,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center - Midland 2,348 FTE
NAT-TCR Neeches House 23.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Webster County Board of Education 23.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tbde Ddf1 23.0 TCR
NAT-TCR South Pierce Fire & Rescue 23.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bickford of Oswego 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glasscock County Coop 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE SEA Seattle - 6100 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haworth Health Environments (Legacy) 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.