Manufacturer of alkaline batteries, battery components; packaging operations · North Carolina

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA

Asheboro, NC · ~226 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Manufacturer of alkaline batteries, battery components; packaging operations workplace, earning a grade A.

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Manufacturer of alkaline batteries, battery components; packaging operations BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA safety composite

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2020

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA injury rate improved

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335912 · Asheboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Ultium Cells, LLC Sp…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~226 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ultium Cells, LLC Spring Hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Manufacturer of alkaline batteries, battery components; packaging operations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA falls in its industry

42 Manufacturer of alkaline batte establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Manufacturer of alkaline batte employers in North Carolina.

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA (226 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 181 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA
Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA (226 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 181 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA has more employees than the Manufacturer of alkaline batteries, batt median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.7 0.5 3 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335912 · NC · Asheboro

42 Manufacturer of alkaline batteries, battery components; packaging operations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ultium Cells, LLC Spring Hill 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6K inc 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaGrange Make Site 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Energizer Manufacturing Inc. Plant 2 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Berry Global 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3889 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3305 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 9639 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR Aerojet Rocketdyne - Orange 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Farmington Hills Treatment Center 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida Port Saint Lucie 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR WMS Hockley 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Golden Gate Disposal Company 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Framerica Corp 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Irvine, CA - Medical Products 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio CAT - Cleveland HE 226 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.