Refuse collection services · California

Golden Gate Disposal Company

San Francisco, CA · ~226 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Golden Gate Disposal Company runs at 813% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refuse collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

Golden Gate Disposal Company: 21.1 TCR = 813% of Refuse collection services BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Golden Gate Disposal Company safety composite

Golden Gate Disposal Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2020

Golden Gate Disposal Company injury rate improved

Golden Gate Disposal Company's TCR fell 1.4 from 18.9 in 2017 to 17.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 27.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.9 · 2018=27.4 · 2019=20.7 · 2020=17.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 21.1 · 813% of ind

  • DART 14.7 DART
  • RANK #230/247
  • PHOTO Winters Bros Hauling…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 174 inj
  • SIZE ~226 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Winters Bros Hauling of CT - Shelton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Golden Gate Disposal Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Golden Gate Disposal Company averages 21.1 TCR (813% of the Refuse collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Golden Gate Disposal Company TCR series: 2017=18.9 · 2018=27.4 · 2019=20.7 · 2020=17.5 · BLS 2.6

Where Golden Gate Disposal Company falls in its industry

2,322 Refuse collection services establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #230 safest of 247 Refuse collection services employers in California.

Golden Gate Disposal Company (226 employees, TCR 21.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Golden Gate Disposal Company
Golden Gate Disposal Company (226 employees, TCR 21.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Golden Gate Disposal Company has more employees than the Refuse collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 17.5 14.7 37 0 0
2019 20.7 18.2 46 3 0
2018 27.4 21.8 56 2 0
2017 18.9 16.0 35 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · San Francisco

2,322 Refuse collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Winters Bros Hauling of CT - Shelton 21.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waste Collection 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Las Vegas Industrial and Medical waste Division 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government- Public Works SWMS- Solid Waste Collection 21.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bayview Vineyards, INC 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Family Tree Farms Inc. 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grower Direct Nut Company 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vinculums Services LLC 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0030-0030-04040 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Resort 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NHC HealthCare Anniston 21.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bonneville Meats 21.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Asheboro - Plant 1, NC, USA 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Framerica Corp 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio CAT - Cleveland HE 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arden House 226 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.