Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Ohio

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc.

Ashland, OH · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. runs at 423% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc.: 11.8 TCR = 423% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. safety composite

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 35% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 35.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.2× in 2024

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 35.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Ashland, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 423% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #298/300
  • PHOTO J.A. Sauer Co.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J.A. Sauer Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. averages 11.8 TCR (423% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=35.4 · 2018=20.2 · 2019=12.2 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=19.3 · 2023=11 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #298 safest of 300 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Ohio.

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ashland Comfort Control, Inc.
Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Ashland Comfort Control, Inc. has fewer employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 11.0 2.8 3 1 1
2022 19.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.2 3.1 2 0 0
2019 12.2 9.1 4 0 0
2018 20.2 13.4 3 0 0
2017 35.4 14.2 5 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OH · Ashland

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 68 employers in Ashland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J.A. Sauer Co. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JENSEN'S PLUMBING & HEATING LLC. 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ENE OF NH 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DEGREE HVAC, Inc. 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Valley Ranch 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 5 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 3 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashland University 2,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Samaritan Medical Center 678 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1448 421 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1448 368 FTE
NAT-TCR Shepherdsville 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR El Ranchero Inc 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Carry Transit - Blair, Ne 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kast Farms Inc. 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Br Pig 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheatley Grain Drier 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plumb Supply Company - Cedar Rapids 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freightliner of Bridgeport 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.