Transitional housing agencies · Ohio

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center

Akron, OH · ~31 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center runs at 454% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Transitional housing agencies workplace, earning a grade F.

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center: 17.3 TCR = 454% of Transitional housing agencies BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center safety composite

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−49.4

2021→2024

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center injury rate improved

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center's TCR fell 49.4 from 49.4 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 49.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=49.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624229 · Akron, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 454% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO ERC-Denver
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ERC-Denver (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center averages 17.3 TCR (454% of the Transitional housing agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center TCR series: 2021=49.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center falls in its industry

89 Transitional housing agencies establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Transitional housing agencies employers in Ohio.

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center (31 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center
CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center (31 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.6

CASC - Community Alternative Sentencing Center has fewer employees than the Transitional housing agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 0.9 14 3 0
2021 49.4 49.4 0 10 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624229 · OH · Akron

89 Transitional housing agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 512 employers in Akron, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ERC-Denver 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ERC-Loveland 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flower City Habitat for Humanity 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ERC - Colorado Springs 21.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Valley Ranch 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 5 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 3 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron 6,746 FTE
CITY-NEAR Akron Children's Hospital 6,060 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summa Health - Akron City 4,801 FTE
CITY-NEAR Akron General Medical Center 4,176 FTE
NAT-TCR Lee County Health and Rehabilitation 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mahwah DNJ2 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SRGA Resort LP 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0681 Glenview 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bay Climate Control & Refrigeration, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kamco Supply - E. Hartford, CT 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Apex NC Yard 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Locust NC Yard 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.