Alloy steel castings (except investment), unfinished, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC

Ashland, PA · ~142 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Alloy steel castings (except investment), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC: 5.0 TCR = 151% of Alloy steel castings (except investment), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC safety composite

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC: 3.7 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2018

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC's TCR rose 2.5 from 3.7 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331513 · Ashland, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 151% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO Northern Stainless C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Northern Stainless Corporation (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC averages 5.0 TCR (151% of the Alloy steel castings (except investment), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC TCR series: 2017=3.7 · 2018=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC falls in its industry

94 Alloy steel castings (except i establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Alloy steel castings (except i employers in Pennsylvania.

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC (142 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 78 employees and a TCR of 7.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC
Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC (142 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 78 employees and a TCR of 7.3

Ashland Foundry and Machine Works, LLC has more employees than the Alloy steel castings (except investment) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.2 2.3 8 0 0
2017 3.7 3.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331513 · PA · Ashland

94 Alloy steel castings (except investment), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 10 employers in Ashland, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Northern Stainless Corporation 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR McConway & Torley Plant 1801 Pittsburgh, PA 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR McConway & Torley, LLC (Arcosa, Inc 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amsted Rail Company Inc 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brunner Island 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kay Builders 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franjo Construction 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smucker Company 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tri-State Ashland 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tri-State Envelope Corporation 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR #212 Gordon, Pa 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR T-S Envelope LLC 156 FTE
NAT-TCR Genesis Medical Center East Campus 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MB-Salt Lake City 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 7 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliance Beverage Dist. Co. LLC Tucson 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilbert Plastic Services-HNC 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE 101620 - USSTRATCOM Replacement Facility-KBG 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Canton Division (NCD) 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland Plant, Route Operations, Field Service and Administrative Office 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.