Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Utah

Ashley Regional Medical Center

Vernal, UT · ~282 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ashley Regional Medical Center runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Ashley Regional Medical Center: 5.4 TCR = 72% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ashley Regional Medical Center safety composite

Ashley Regional Medical Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2024

Ashley Regional Medical Center injury rate improved

Ashley Regional Medical Center's TCR fell 2.2 from 7.5 in 2017 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.5 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Vernal, UT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 5.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/38
  • PHOTO SIMPSONVILLE MEDICAL…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~282 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SIMPSONVILLE MEDICAL CAMPUS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Ashley Regional Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ashley Regional Medical Center averages 5.4 TCR (72% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ashley Regional Medical Center TCR series: 2017=7.5 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 7.5

Where Ashley Regional Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 38 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Utah.

Ashley Regional Medical Center (282 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ashley Regional Medical Center
Ashley Regional Medical Center (282 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Ashley Regional Medical Center has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 0.0 7 2 0
2023 3.5 0.0 6 1 0
2022 4.5 0.0 6 3 0
2021 4.0 0.6 5 2 0
2020 5.9 1.8 9 1 0
2019 5.1 1.3 5 3 0
2018 7.1 1.8 11 1 0
2017 7.5 1.0 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · UT · Vernal

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 32 employers in Vernal, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SIMPSONVILLE MEDICAL CAMPUS 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leonard J. Chabert Medical Center 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MERCY HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ROANE MEDICAL CENTER 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack's Tire & Oil Management Company, Inc. 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herbergers 322 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE 706-00279 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMS Masonry 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR BHI - Vernal 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR B H, Inc. 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1572 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1572 336 FTE
NAT-TCR CBC Coating 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert Skinner Filtration Plant 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hermantown Clinic 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bell Container Corp. 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Napa Corporate Offices 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Dafo, Inc 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shop Rite of Hillsborough 282 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.