Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · New Jersey

Bell Container Corp.

Newark, NJ · ~282 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bell Container Corp. runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Bell Container Corp.: 2.9 TCR = 86% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bell Container Corp. safety composite

Bell Container Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2017→2024

Bell Container Corp. injury rate improved

Bell Container Corp.'s TCR fell 3.7 from 5.5 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.5 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Newark, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 86% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #13/21
  • PHOTO Pratt (Converting Di…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~282 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pratt (Converting Division Houston) LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Bell Container Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bell Container Corp. averages 2.9 TCR (86% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bell Container Corp. TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Bell Container Corp. falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 21 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in New Jersey.

Bell Container Corp. (282 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Bell Container Corp.
Bell Container Corp. (282 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Bell Container Corp. has more employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 6 0 0
2023 2.2 1.9 7 0 0
2022 2.9 2.5 7 1 0
2021 1.0 1.0 2 1 0
2020 1.7 1.7 5 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 8 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 14 0 0
2017 5.5 5.5 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · NJ · Newark

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pratt (Converting Division Houston) LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PackageOne-Sacramento 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Folding Carton Division - 03 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX300 Waxahachie Container 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nordic Contracting Inc. 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6721 South Plainfield 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE R&D Altanova 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dr. Reddy's Laboratories. INC 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Cook Children's Medical Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Just Farms LP 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wickliffe 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR J & A Solari Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ashley Regional Medical Center 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Napa Corporate Offices 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascade Dafo, Inc 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Industrial Painting Ltd., Inc. 282 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.