Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Georgia

Ashlind Contracting Corporation

Washington, GA · ~29 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ashlind Contracting Corporation runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Ashlind Contracting Corporation: 2.3 TCR = 82% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ashlind Contracting Corporation safety composite

Ashlind Contracting Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2024

Ashlind Contracting Corporation injury rate improved

Ashlind Contracting Corporation's TCR fell 6.8 from 6.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Washington, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/33
  • PHOTO Methuen Construction
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Methuen Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Ashlind Contracting Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ashlind Contracting Corporation averages 2.3 TCR (82% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ashlind Contracting Corporation TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Ashlind Contracting Corporation falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 33 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Georgia.

Ashlind Contracting Corporation (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ashlind Contracting Corporation
Ashlind Contracting Corporation (29 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Ashlind Contracting Corporation has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 8.3 8.3 2 1 0
2017 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2016 6.8 3.4 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · GA · Washington

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 14 employers in Washington, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Methuen Construction 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSU HQ Pennridge 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webb Incorporated 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JFShea Construction-Walnut Water 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta TMC - 805 W. Savannah Ave. Valdosta, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global Washington Georgia Facility 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global Corp 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barnett Southern Corporation 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novipax 85 FTE
NAT-TCR Carter Electric, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Electric, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Yarco Company, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McLaughlin 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 44-Sedalia 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie Elementary 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #53 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #44 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.