Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Arizona

ASPC Yuma

San Luis, AZ · ~39 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ASPC Yuma runs at 360% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade F.

ASPC Yuma: 10.8 TCR = 360% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ASPC Yuma safety composite

ASPC Yuma scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ASPC Yuma: 0.0 → 17.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 17.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

ASPC Yuma's TCR rose 17.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 17.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · San Luis, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 360% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #137/152
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT ADRIAN COL…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT ADRIAN COLLEGE WOW WINGERY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

ASPC Yuma in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ASPC Yuma averages 10.8 TCR (360% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ASPC Yuma TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=9 · 2018=12 · 2019=13.9 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=12.9 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=17.9 · BLS 3.0

Where ASPC Yuma falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #137 safest of 152 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Arizona.

ASPC Yuma (39 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate ASPC Yuma
ASPC Yuma (39 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

ASPC Yuma has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 17.9 0.0 6 0 0
2022 12.3 0.0 4 0 0
2021 12.9 3.2 4 0 0
2020 8.3 8.0 34 44 1
2019 13.9 0.0 5 0 0
2018 12.0 2.4 5 0 0
2017 9.0 0.0 4 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · AZ · San Luis

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 21 employers in San Luis, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT ADRIAN COLLEGE WOW WINGERY 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4021-640778500 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waupun Area School District 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brooks Rehabilitation Hospital 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE MyLand 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novo Power 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Grove 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharp Drywall 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASPC-Yuma 995 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arizona State Prison Complex Yuma 958 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of San Luis 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4337 324 FTE
NAT-TCR Jefferson Learning Center 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BSI, LLC Garage Door 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Kentucky Blood Center - Beaumont 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt. Greylock Extended Care Facility 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holly Ridge Manor 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill of the Great Plains S. Norton 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vcf 830 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6900 Steger 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.