Continuing care retirement communities · Montana

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community

Name: Aspen Meadows Retirement Community Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Billings, MT · ~118 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 13.6
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community runs at 358% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community: 13.6 TCR = 358% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community safety composite

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 13.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers
DART rate: F 17.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community: 7.2 → 20.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 20.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.29× in 2017

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community's TCR rose 12.7 from 7.2 in 2016 to 20.0 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Billings, MT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 358% of ind

DART 17.5 DART
RANK #15/27
PHOTO Hollenbeck Palms
BOOK 2y book
INJ 16 inj
SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hollenbeck Palms (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

This site

13.6
Hollenbeck Pal

13.6
Sugar Creek Al

13.6
Cedarhurst of

13.6
Lake Winona Ma

13.6

What this shows Aspen Meadows Retirement Community averages 13.6 TCR (358% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=20 · BLS 3.8

Where Aspen Meadows Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 27 Continuing care retirement com employers in Montana.

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community (118 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Aspen Meadows Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	20.0	17.5	8	0	0
2016	7.2	4.5	8	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MT · Billings

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 327 employers in Billings, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Hollenbeck Palms	LOS ANGELES, CA	13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sugar Creek Alzheimer's Special Care Center	NORMAL, IL	13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cedarhurst of Jacksonville	JACKSONVILLE, IL	13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Lake Winona Manor	WINONA, MN	13.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Century Companies, Inc	LEWISTOWN	118 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Barnard Construction Company, Inc.- Bozeman	BOZEMAN	118 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Williams Plumbing & Heating - Bozeman	BOZEMAN	118 FTE
STATE-SIZE	706-00166	GREAT FALLS	118 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Billings Clinic Hospital	Billings	2,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR	St. Vincent Healthcare	Billings	1,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Billings Clinic Downtown Campus	Billings	1,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR	St. John's Lutheran Ministries	Billings	651 FTE
NAT-TCR	Site Amenities	Mcalester, OK	13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Cavann-Opi-Van Nuys	Van Nuys, CA	13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	San Diego - RCCB	San Diego, CA	13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	West Babylon ShopRite #835	West Babylon, NY	13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	N and R of St Charles LLC	St Charles, MO	118 FTE
NAT-SIZE	N and R of Springfield East LLC	Springfield, MO	118 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Trig's Everest Metro	Weston, WI	118 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Jessicas Brick Oven	North Andover, MA	118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.