Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Illinois

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville

Jacksonville, IL · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville runs at 358% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville: 13.6 TCR = 358% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville safety composite

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.9

2016→2019

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville injury rate improved

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville's TCR fell 13.9 from 21.6 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 21.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=21.6 · 2017=11.4 · 2019=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Jacksonville, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 358% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #206/265
  • PHOTO Aspen Meadows Retire…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aspen Meadows Retirement Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedarhurst of Jacksonville averages 13.6 TCR (358% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville TCR series: 2016=21.6 · 2017=11.4 · 2019=7.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedarhurst of Jacksonville falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #206 safest of 265 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville (38 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedarhurst of Jacksonville
Cedarhurst of Jacksonville (38 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cedarhurst of Jacksonville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 7.7 5.2 3 0 0
2017 11.4 2.9 4 0 0
2016 21.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Jacksonville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 66 employers in Jacksonville, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aspen Meadows Retirement Community 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake Winona Manor 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hollenbeck Palms 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sugar Creek Alzheimer's Special Care Center 13.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE GDM Seeds, Inc - Gibson City, IL 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Distribution Operating - Peoria 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 629 - Distribution Operating - Peoria 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeport 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Passavant Area Hospital 781 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jacksonville Memorial Hospital 666 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reynolds Consumer Products- Jacksonville West Plant 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCP Jax West Plant 450 FTE
NAT-TCR Hin 09 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 302 N Mildred St 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 118 - Blue Springs Retail Store 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Uge Bhm 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maya Dairy 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silktown Roofing, Inc.-North/S.Grafton MA 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birmingham - 3645 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Long Island - 270 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.