Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard · Georgia

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia

Macon, GA · ~189 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia: 4.5 TCR = 136% of Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia safety composite

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2018→2024

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia injury rate improved

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia's TCR fell 4.6 from 6.8 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.8 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Macon, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 136% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO KY042 Lexington Plan…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KY042 Lexington Plant & DC (Dixie) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia averages 4.5 TCR (136% of the Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia TCR series: 2018=6.8 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia falls in its industry

140 Food containers, sanitary (exc establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Food containers, sanitary (exc employers in Georgia.

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia (189 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia
Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia (189 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia has more employees than the Food containers, sanitary (except foldin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.7 2 1 0
2018 6.8 5.8 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · GA · Macon

140 Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 300 employers in Macon, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KY042 Lexington Plant & DC (Dixie) 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Welcome Tube 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR IPG Longview 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caraustar Phoenix Tube Plant 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Osage Vegetable Farm 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLS Customer Care Center 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Mechanical Contractors, LLC 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE EKC Columbus GA 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Center, Navicent Health 3,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1201-Navicent Health Medical Center 3,858 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SAV3 1,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SAV3 1,305 FTE
NAT-TCR Yuma County Library District 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Jc Smith Inc 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Solar Energy Solutions 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Horizon Specialty Hospital of Las Vegas 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Delmar Center 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robin Run Village 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mb Herzog Electric Inc 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.