Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production · Georgia

Osage Vegetable Farm

Rabun Gap, GA · ~189 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Osage Vegetable Farm runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production workplace, earning a grade D.

Osage Vegetable Farm: 7.3 TCR = 163% of Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Osage Vegetable Farm safety composite

Osage Vegetable Farm scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 49.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Osage Vegetable Farm: 0.0 → 49.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 49.2 TCR · DART/TCR 6.69× in 2024

Osage Vegetable Farm's TCR rose 49.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 49.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 6.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Rabun Gap, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 163% of ind

  • DART 49.2 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO Griffin Ranches, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Griffin Ranches, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Osage Vegetable Farm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Osage Vegetable Farm averages 7.3 TCR (163% of the Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Osage Vegetable Farm TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=49.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Osage Vegetable Farm falls in its industry

331 Vegetable and melon farming, v establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Vegetable and melon farming, v employers in Georgia.

Osage Vegetable Farm (189 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Osage Vegetable Farm
Osage Vegetable Farm (189 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Osage Vegetable Farm has more employees than the Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 49.2 49.2 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · GA · Rabun Gap

331 Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 7 employers in Rabun Gap, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Griffin Ranches, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Potato 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3181_6797 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. - 301 Packing House 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE AGLS Customer Care Center 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Mechanical Contractors, LLC 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aspen Products, Inc. Georgia 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE EKC Columbus GA 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 24 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkdale America LLC Plant 24 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gap Partners 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osage Farm Market 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Film Tech LLC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR WCA Group, LLC Indianapolis 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Timberworks 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Culligan - Pittsburgh 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Salt Lake 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Northern Corporation - Twin Cities 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dal1-Dwh-Dallas Division 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Younger Brothers Door & Trim LLC 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.