Foam polystyrene products manufacturing · Tennessee

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee

Manchester, TN · ~58 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee runs at 443% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foam polystyrene products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee: 14.6 TCR = 443% of Foam polystyrene products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee safety composite

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee: 7.5 → 17.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 19.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee's TCR rose 9.6 from 7.5 in 2022 to 17.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Manchester, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 443% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/17
  • PHOTO Polar Industries, In…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Polar Industries, Inc. - Gramar (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee averages 14.6 TCR (443% of the Foam polystyrene products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee TCR series: 2022=7.5 · 2023=19.1 · 2024=17.2 · BLS 3.3

Where ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee falls in its industry

260 Foam polystyrene products manu establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 17 Foam polystyrene products manu employers in Tennessee.

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee (58 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee
ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee (58 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee has fewer employees than the Foam polystyrene products manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.2 0.0 13 0 0
2023 19.1 0.0 10 0 0
2022 7.5 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · TN · Manchester

260 Foam polystyrene products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 43 employers in Manchester, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Polar Industries, Inc. - Gramar 14.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPK-NJ 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Employ Source Staffing Solutions 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texas Foam Inc. 15.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grinder & Haizlip Construction, Inc 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8018174 - 1903 Terminal Lobby and IAF 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walker Building Group LLC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE REMBCO GEOTECHNICAL 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manchester / Smyrna 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viam Manufacturing, Inc. 523 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese Company, Inc. - Manchester 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese of Tennessee, Inc. 361 FTE
NAT-TCR Nelz Logistics LLC 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McCracken County Road Department 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ACJK Corp dba Berg Tool Inc 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MARKET-CHARLOTTE 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Health 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vital Consulting Group 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Kullen #37 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alden Estates of Skokie 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.