Industry profile · NAICS 326140

Dinnerware, polystyrene foam, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 283 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

283
Employers
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
4,052
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Dinnerware, polystyrene foam, manufacturing average 3.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
283
employers reporting
4,052
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Dinnerware, polystyrene foam, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Dinnerware, polystyrene foam, manufacturing sector (NAICS 326140) encompasses 283 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 4,052 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Dinnerware, polystyrene foam, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 6
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Foam Fabricators, Inc. Compton, CA F 21.5
1301 E 8th St North Little Rock, AR F 16.3
Texas Foam Inc. Bastrop, TX F 15.9
Employ Source Staffing Solutions Dekalb, IL F 15.7
CPK-NJ Edison, NJ F 15.0
Polar Industries, Inc. - Gramar Prospect, CT F 14.8
ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Tennessee Manchester, TN F 14.6
Michigan Foam Products Grand Rapids, MI F 12.8
Alleguard - Greenville Greenville, MI F 12.6
Styrene Products, Inc. - Arcadia WI Arcadia, WI F 11.0
CPK-TN Memphis, TN F 11.0
Alleguard - West Brookfield West Brookfield, MA F 10.8
Insul-Bead Corporation Gravette, AR F 10.5
Drew Foam Companies, Inc. of Tennessee Portland, TN F 10.1
Manufacturing Plant Ormond Beach, FL F 10.0
ASPEN TECHNOLOGIES INC - Michigan Brighton, Mi, MI F 9.9
LaSalle Bristol IN 3702 Elkhart, IN F 9.6
Cellox, LLC Reedsburg, WI F 9.5
Cellofoam-Conyers, GA-ROTO Conyers, GA F 9.0
Benchmark Foam Inc Watertown, SD F 8.9
IWT - Salisbury Salisbury, NC F 8.4
Storopack, Inc. - Winston Salem Winston Salem, NC F 8.3
R.L. Adams Plastics, Inc. Wyoming, MI F 8.2
Fort Worth Arlington, TX F 8.1
Foam Fabricators Modesto, CA F 8.0
Alleguard - Radford Radford, VA F 7.8
281 Southwest Tallmadge, OH F 7.3
Drew Foam Companies, Inc. Monticello, AR F 7.2
Aqua Foam Kokomo, IN F 7.2
Drew Foam of South Carolina Inc. Anderson, SC F 7.1
Alleguard - Allentown Allentown, PA F 7.0
Republic Plastics, Ltd. (AZ) Eloy, AZ F 6.9
Plymouth Foam Gnadenhutten, OH Gnadenhutten, OH F 6.9
Polar Industries, Inc. Prospect, CT F 6.8
Iowa Eps Products Des Moines, IA F 6.8
EFP, LLC - Nashville La Vergne, TN D 6.5
Atlas Molded Products Arlington, TX D 6.4
Atlas Molded Products, A Division of Atlas Roofing Corporation Reno, NV D 6.4
Foam Fabricators, Inc Jefferson, GA D 6.3
Styrene Products - Schofield Schofield, WI D 6.3
Carlisle EPS Holding LLC Prospect, CT D 6.3
WinCup Tolleson Phoenix, AZ D 6.3
Styrene Products, Inc. - Schofield, WI Schofield, WI D 6.2
Cellofoam-Sallisaw, OK-ROTO/FAB (NonEPS) Sallisaw, OK D 6.2
ESCO Group Inc. Grand Rapids, MI D 6.0
Alleguard - Greer Greer, SC D 6.0
ACH Foam Technologies 3rd Street Kansas City, KS D 6.0
Cellofoam-Orlando, FL Orlando, FL D 5.8
Harbor Foam, LLC Grandville, MI D 5.8
YCS Austin, TX D 5.8
Page 1 of 6 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Dinnerware, polystyrene foam, manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.