Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Montana

Aspen View

Billings, MT · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aspen View runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Aspen View: 5.5 TCR = 146% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aspen View safety composite

Aspen View scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aspen View: 0.0 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2022

Aspen View's TCR rose 6.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 6.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Billings, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 146% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #5/14
  • PHOTO Great Lakes Manageme…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Lakes Management GTHI The Glenn Minnetonka (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Aspen View in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aspen View averages 5.5 TCR (146% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aspen View TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5 · 2019=0 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Aspen View falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 14 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Montana.

Aspen View (28 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Aspen View
Aspen View (28 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Aspen View has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.4 6.4 1 0 0
2021 11.5 11.5 2 0 0
2020 10.3 5.2 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MT · Billings

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 327 employers in Billings, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI The Glenn Minnetonka 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Landing at Hampstead 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63189 SUNRISE OF DECATUR 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peachtree Senior Living 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Montana Dakota Utilities - Glendive, MT 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Sky Build, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Construction 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jeffery Contracting 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Hospital 2,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Vincent Healthcare 1,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Downtown Campus 1,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Lutheran Ministries 651 FTE
NAT-TCR ServiceMaster Commercial Cleaning Advantage 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR James Hardie Building Products-Pulaski VA 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SACHEM-Austin 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beaverdale Estates 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blair House 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital Place 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cedar Ridge 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.