Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · North Carolina

Cedar Ridge

Name: Cedar Ridge Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Burlington, NC · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.8
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Ridge runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Cedar Ridge: 1.8 TCR = 48% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Ridge safety composite

Cedar Ridge scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers
DART rate: F 5.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedar Ridge: 0.0 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 3.01× in 2022

Cedar Ridge's TCR rose 5.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 5.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 3.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Burlington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 48% of ind

DART 5.5 DART
RANK #7/105
PHOTO Grand Lodge
BOOK 6y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grand Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.8
Grand Lodge

1.8
The Pines Assi

1.8
Chisolm Trail

1.8
Dominion Senio

1.8

What this shows Cedar Ridge averages 1.8 TCR (48% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Cedar Ridge TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=5.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedar Ridge falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 105 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Cedar Ridge (28 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cedar Ridge has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	5.5	5.5	1
2021	5.5	0.0	1
2020	0.0	0.0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Burlington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 148 employers in Burlington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Grand Lodge	LINCOLN, NE	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	The Pines Assisted Living	RICHFIELD, MN	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Chisolm Trail of Keene Senior Living	KEENE, TX	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Dominion Senior Living of Anderson	ANDERSON, SC	1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	H & D Farms, Inc.	AUTRYVILLE	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	SMITH FARMS	YADKINVILLE	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Michael Morris Farms	AHOSKIE	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Elkin Hatchery	ELKIN	28 FTE
CITY-NEAR	National OnDemand, Inc	Burlington	511 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Twin Lakes Community	Burlington	410 FTE
CITY-NEAR	York Road	Burlington	398 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lutheran Retirement Ministries of Alamance County	Burlington	373 FTE
NAT-TCR	Brentwood Estates	Lincoln, NE	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Weeks Marine	Cranford, NJ	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Central Wisconsin Management Inc.	Marshfield, WI	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Fairport Site	Fairport, NY	1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Capital Place	Olympia, WA	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Blair House	Normal, IL	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Beaverdale Estates	Des Moines, IA	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Aspen View	Billings, MT	28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.