Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Ohio

Asplundh Construction LLC 118

Columbus, OH · ~27 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Asplundh Construction LLC 118 runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Asplundh Construction LLC 118: 2.7 TCR = 96% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Asplundh Construction LLC 118 safety composite

Asplundh Construction LLC 118 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2018→2020

Asplundh Construction LLC 118 injury rate improved

Asplundh Construction LLC 118's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.6 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/37
  • PHOTO LEM Large Projects
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEM Large Projects (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Asplundh Construction LLC 118 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Asplundh Construction LLC 118 averages 2.7 TCR (96% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Asplundh Construction LLC 118 TCR series: 2018=4.6 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Asplundh Construction LLC 118 falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 37 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Ohio.

Asplundh Construction LLC 118 (27 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Asplundh Construction LLC 118
Asplundh Construction LLC 118 (27 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Asplundh Construction LLC 118 has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · OH · Columbus

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEM Large Projects 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR KMM Telecommunications 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caledonia, MI 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Towers, LLC 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeff Creque Farms Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE White Pond Gardens Inc 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wen Mar Farms, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Croton Pullet 2 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Memphis, TN - Global Logistics Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Strattec Milwaukee 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR erin erectors and construction inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jamco America 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Claiborne Farmers Coop 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Saver Foods #13 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.