Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Connecticut

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC

Chester, CT · ~27 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC: 3.4 TCR = 89% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC safety composite

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2020

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC injury rate improved

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chester, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/100
  • PHOTO The Waterford at Bay…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Waterford at Baytown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC averages 3.4 TCR (89% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=2.7 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Connecticut.

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC (27 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC
Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC (27 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Eagle Landing Residential Care, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.3 4.2 2 0 0
2017 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2016 5.8 5.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CT · Chester

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 18 employers in Chester, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Baytown 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL-Bridgewood Gardens 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villages of St Peters Memory Care 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage House of Portage 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bridgeport Harbor Station Unit 5 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plainfield Renewable Energy 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE WORTH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zampell Refractories CT 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 557 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aaron Manor 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRIAN HOUSE INC 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aaron Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 128 FTE
NAT-TCR Wesley Woods Geriatric Hosp 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lessors, Inc.- Dover 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Club of Buffalo 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR John Deere Seeding Group - Valley City 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Asplundh Construction LLC 118 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Claiborne Farmers Coop 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Saver Foods #13 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.