Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Minnesota

Asset Management Support

Fergus Falls, MN · ~85 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Asset Management Support runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Asset Management Support: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Asset Management Support safety composite

Asset Management Support scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Asset Management Support held a steady TCR band

Asset Management Support's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Fergus Falls, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/24
  • PHOTO 00525 NORTH TEMPLE O…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00525 NORTH TEMPLE OFFICE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Asset Management Support in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Asset Management Support averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Asset Management Support TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Asset Management Support falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 24 Electric power generation, fos employers in Minnesota.

Asset Management Support (85 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Asset Management Support
Asset Management Support (85 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Asset Management Support has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MN · Fergus Falls

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 77 employers in Fergus Falls, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00525 NORTH TEMPLE OFFICE 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calpine Energy Solutions 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arena Building 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weis Builders Inc. - Minneapolis Location 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ebert Inc 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE AZCO INC. - Mankato Energy Center 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE TMCLE - Telcom Construction 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake Region Healthcare Corporation 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR LB Homes 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1696 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1696 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Envelope Printery, Inc. 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Infra-Metals Co-Ga 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05931 - RA Newark St Charles Street MRF 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Gate, Ca 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.