Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · Minnesota

Associated Finishing Inc.

Mankato, MN · ~116 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Associated Finishing Inc. runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Associated Finishing Inc.: 5.1 TCR = 155% of Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Associated Finishing Inc. safety composite

Associated Finishing Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2018→2024

Associated Finishing Inc. injury rate improved

Associated Finishing Inc.'s TCR fell 2.2 from 7.2 in 2018 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/9
  • PHOTO Rust-Oleum
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rust-Oleum (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Associated Finishing Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Associated Finishing Inc. averages 5.1 TCR (155% of the Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Associated Finishing Inc. TCR series: 2018=7.2 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Associated Finishing Inc. falls in its industry

530 Industrial product finishes an establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 9 Industrial product finishes an employers in Minnesota.

Associated Finishing Inc. (116 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Associated Finishing Inc.
Associated Finishing Inc. (116 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Associated Finishing Inc. has more employees than the Industrial product finishes and coatings median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 0.0 4 0 0
2023 5.7 0.0 6 0 0
2022 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2021 4.1 0.0 4 0 0
2020 5.1 0.0 5 0 0
2019 5.2 0.0 5 0 0
2018 7.2 0.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · MN · Mankato

530 Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rust-Oleum 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR True Value Manufacturing 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maclan Corporation 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Torginol, Inc 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bradbury Stamm Construction, Inc 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Curb Masters, Inc. 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berd Electric 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Design Electric, Inc. 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwest Acoust-A-Fiber 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 3022 LKQ Keystone Linthicum 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR JFFFI-Merced 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Residence Inn University Circle/Medical Center 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE C470 Hickory 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Beach Hotel 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Naturally Foods, Inc. 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scott and Reid General Contractors 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.