Continuing care retirement communities · Florida

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay

Tampa, FL · ~146 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay runs at 304% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay: 11.5 TCR = 304% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay safety composite

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2024

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay injury rate improved

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay's TCR fell 6.8 from 11.5 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 25.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.5 · 2017=14.8 · 2019=15.5 · 2020=13.5 · 2021=25.4 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 304% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #232/283
  • PHOTO Salmon Creek
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salmon Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay averages 11.5 TCR (304% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=14.8 · 2019=15.5 · 2020=13.5 · 2021=25.4 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #232 safest of 283 Continuing care retirement com employers in Florida.

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay (146 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay
Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay (146 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 3.5 4 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 3 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 4 0 0
2021 25.4 7.4 9 15 0
2020 13.5 13.5 7 7 0
2019 15.5 10.3 14 1 0
2017 14.8 14.8 13 1 0
2016 11.5 11.5 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Tampa

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salmon Creek 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augustine Landing 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Watertown AL/IL 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE MEADOWS MANOR 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE W. Gardner, LLC 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sauer Construction, LLC 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Development & Construction, Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deme Construction LLC 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Sysco Syracuse 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TownePlace Suites 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Whetstone Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Shumaker Industries 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cogmedix, Inc. 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walker White Inc 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schneider Packaging Equipment 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fabbrica LLC Jobsites 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.