Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · South Dakota

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL

Watertown, SD · ~47 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL: 11.5 TCR = 303% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL safety composite

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.9

2019→2024

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL injury rate improved

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL's TCR fell 15.9 from 24.9 in 2019 to 9.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 24.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=24.9 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Watertown, SD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 303% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #14/22
  • PHOTO THE MEADOWS MANOR
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: THE MEADOWS MANOR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edgewood Watertown AL/IL averages 11.5 TCR (303% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL TCR series: 2019=24.9 · 2020=13.7 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=6 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=9 · BLS 3.8

Where Edgewood Watertown AL/IL falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 22 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Dakota.

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL (47 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Edgewood Watertown AL/IL
Edgewood Watertown AL/IL (47 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Edgewood Watertown AL/IL has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 6.0 3 0 0
2023 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2022 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 11.8 5.9 2 2 0
2020 13.7 5.5 4 1 0
2019 24.9 7.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · SD · Watertown

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 80 employers in Watertown, SD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR THE MEADOWS MANOR 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aston Gardens At Tampa Bay 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salmon Creek 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augustine Landing 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Garfield 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egger Steel Company 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE TrueNorth Steel- Huron 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE SRAM - Spearfish 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prairie Lakes Healthcare System 611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prairie Lakes Healthcare 601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terex - Watertown 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1500 352 FTE
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Hamden Operation LLC 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR FourShare LLC dba Battery Watering Technologies 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Factor Sales, Inc. Del Sol 4 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine Bluff Feed Mill 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE PSI Valdez Refinery 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vertec Tool, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Runnings of Hinsdale 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE August Roofing Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.