Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Indiana

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon

Mt. Vernon, IN · ~658 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon: 0.4 TCR = 11% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon safety composite

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2018

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon injury rate improved

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.4 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Mt. Vernon, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/24
  • PHOTO Amgen Inc. (Rhode Is…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~658 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amgen Inc. (Rhode Island) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AstraZenca Mt. Vernon averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon TCR series: 2016=0.4 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where AstraZenca Mt. Vernon falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 24 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Indiana.

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon (658 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate AstraZenca Mt. Vernon
AstraZenca Mt. Vernon (658 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

AstraZenca Mt. Vernon has more employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.7 0.3 4 0 0
2016 0.4 0.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · IN · Mt. Vernon

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 17 employers in Mt. Vernon, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amgen Inc. (Rhode Island) 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shine Technologies 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AstraZeneca West Chester, OH 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Takeda: USA Field Sales Employees 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE ELSA LLC 658 FTE
STATE-SIZE Community Howard main hospital 658 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8027605-Heartland Automotive 657 FTE
STATE-SIZE INI16 - 16TH STREET 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR SABIC Innovative Plastics Mt. Vernon, LLC. 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca - Mt.Vernon 742 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mt. Vernon Shingle 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tron Mechanical, Inc. 143 FTE
NAT-TCR Sioux City Neal North 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KCP&L - 801 Charlotte 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 100179 - Kamehameha Guideway 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ncdot It 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE R&D Center 658 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gates Corporation 658 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ponca City Refinery 658 FTE
NAT-SIZE Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc. 658 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.