Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing · North Carolina

ATI Industrial Automation

Apex, NC · ~299 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ATI Industrial Automation runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

ATI Industrial Automation: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ATI Industrial Automation safety composite

ATI Industrial Automation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ATI Industrial Automation: 0.7 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2024

ATI Industrial Automation's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.7 in 2019 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Apex, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO HORIBA Automotive Troy
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~299 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HORIBA Automotive Troy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

ATI Industrial Automation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ATI Industrial Automation averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ATI Industrial Automation TCR series: 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.4 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where ATI Industrial Automation falls in its industry

322 Measuring instruments, industr establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Measuring instruments, industr employers in North Carolina.

ATI Industrial Automation (299 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate ATI Industrial Automation
ATI Industrial Automation (299 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

ATI Industrial Automation has more employees than the Measuring instruments, industrial proces median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.9 4 1 0
2023 3.8 3.0 10 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 4 0 0
2020 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · NC · Apex

322 Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 92 employers in Apex, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HORIBA Automotive Troy 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-NH115 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dwyer Instruments Inc - Grandview MO 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building Automation Products Inc 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Plant 5 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5520 Forest City Permanent 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Attends Healthcare 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Home Group 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apex Tool Group - Apex Operation 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR Apex Tool Group - Apex Operations 445 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crowder Construction Company - Civil & Environmental Division 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donley's Concrete Group LLC 321 FTE
NAT-TCR Belfast Me 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DiPietro Excavating Inc 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Addison Frame Shop 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR South Commonwealth Partners, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rogue Valley Door, Inc. 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE Exponential Power 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8020789 Mars Petcare Matton IL 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vector Force Development LLC 299 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.