Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing · Oregon

Rogue Valley Door, Inc.

Grants Pass, OR · ~299 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rogue Valley Door, Inc. runs at 320% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Rogue Valley Door, Inc.: 10.6 TCR = 320% of Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rogue Valley Door, Inc. safety composite

Rogue Valley Door, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2023

Rogue Valley Door, Inc. injury rate improved

Rogue Valley Door, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.7 from 13.3 in 2016 to 9.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.3 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=10.8 · 2019=11.6 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=9.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321911 · Grants Pass, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 320% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #18/24
  • PHOTO Reilly Windows & Doors
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 240 inj
  • SIZE ~299 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reilly Windows & Doors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Rogue Valley Door, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rogue Valley Door, Inc. averages 10.6 TCR (320% of the Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rogue Valley Door, Inc. TCR series: 2016=13.3 · 2017=11.3 · 2018=10.8 · 2019=11.6 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=9.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Rogue Valley Door, Inc. falls in its industry

452 Doors, wood and covered wood, establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 24 Doors, wood and covered wood, employers in Oregon.

Rogue Valley Door, Inc. (299 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rogue Valley Door, Inc.
Rogue Valley Door, Inc. (299 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Rogue Valley Door, Inc. has more employees than the Doors, wood and covered wood, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.6 7.8 24 3 0
2022 10.8 9.1 31 0 0
2021 8.2 6.8 21 2 0
2020 8.8 7.7 25 0 0
2019 11.6 10.3 35 1 0
2018 10.8 7.5 31 2 0
2017 11.3 8.8 31 1 0
2016 13.3 10.8 42 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321911 · OR · Grants Pass

452 Doors, wood and covered wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 130 employers in Grants Pass, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reilly Windows & Doors 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Young Manufacturing Company, In. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acadian Millwork & Supply Co., Inc. 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TrimLine Windows 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Engineering and Technical Services 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5424 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DPD8 299 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2643-36060001-360601 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rever Grand 2,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colvin Oil I, LLC DBA GP Energy 744 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grants Pass, OR 480 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1834 423 FTE
NAT-TCR Vince Taylor 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TP Aerospace - Orlando 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SPI- Shasta Lake 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Department 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE ATI Industrial Automation 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE Exponential Power 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE OC - Delmar, NY 299 FTE
NAT-SIZE KHS USA, Inc. 299 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.