Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire · Massachusetts

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty

New Bedford, MA · ~268 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade D.

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty: 5.0 TCR = 151% of Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty safety composite

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2023→2024

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty injury rate improved

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty's TCR fell 2.0 from 6.0 in 2023 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=6.0 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · New Bedford, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 151% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #17/20
  • PHOTO Marmon Utility LLC S…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~268 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marmon Utility LLC Seymour (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty averages 5.0 TCR (151% of the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty TCR series: 2023=6 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty falls in its industry

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 20 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, employers in Massachusetts.

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty (268 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty
Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty (268 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Atkore-New Bedford Flaherty has more employees than the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 3.6 11 0 0
2023 6.0 2.5 11 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · MA · New Bedford

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 109 employers in New Bedford, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marmon Utility LLC Seymour 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radix Wire Plant 1 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Data Guide Cable Corp 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LS Cable & System USA -Tarboro Plant 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Westfield (formerly Prolamina/Jen-Coat) 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2693 - Braintree 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE 21270000 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE MA0267CBC 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital 2,204 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point & Affiliated Organizations 1,264 FTE
CITY-NEAR JAMCO 690 FTE
CITY-NEAR LifeStream 644 FTE
NAT-TCR Westside Hulling Association 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lalkc - Lake Charles 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southdale Medical Building 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. John Rehabilitation Hospital, an affiliate of Encompass Health 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE ShopRite Of Spotswood 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE EB Ridges Care Center 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dee Cramer 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richardson Home Care 268 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.