Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Georgia

Atlanta Corporate Office

Atlanta, GA · ~116 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atlanta Corporate Office runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Atlanta Corporate Office: 0.6 TCR = 16% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atlanta Corporate Office safety composite

Atlanta Corporate Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2023

Atlanta Corporate Office injury rate improved

Atlanta Corporate Office's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.1 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/19
  • PHOTO Mill Basin
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mill Basin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Atlanta Corporate Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atlanta Corporate Office averages 0.6 TCR (16% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atlanta Corporate Office TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Atlanta Corporate Office falls in its industry

2,261 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 19 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Georgia.

Atlanta Corporate Office (116 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Atlanta Corporate Office
Atlanta Corporate Office (116 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Atlanta Corporate Office has more employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · GA · Atlanta

2,261 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mill Basin 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brilliant Corners 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autism Learning Partners Monrovia 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reilly Residence 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE TX-Morrow Construction Co Inc 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monroe County Hospital 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rebar Erection, Inc. 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fire & Life Safety America Atlanta 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Nautilus, Inc. - Vancouver 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #26 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Market Basket #41 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR R.G. Anderson Company.Com 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grand Traverse Container-GR 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loffredo Fresh Foods 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE 124 - Walsh - Flour Design Build Team 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xtreme Elements LLC 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.