Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Michigan

Grand Traverse Container-GR

Grand Rapids, MI · ~116 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Grand Traverse Container-GR runs at 279% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

Grand Traverse Container-GR: 9.2 TCR = 279% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Grand Traverse Container-GR safety composite

Grand Traverse Container-GR scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.9

2018→2023

Grand Traverse Container-GR injury rate improved

Grand Traverse Container-GR's TCR fell 32.9 from 36.6 in 2018 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 36.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=36.6 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 279% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #54/60
  • PHOTO Fluted Partition
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fluted Partition (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Grand Traverse Container-GR in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Grand Traverse Container-GR averages 9.2 TCR (279% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Grand Traverse Container-GR TCR series: 2018=36.6 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=3 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Grand Traverse Container-GR falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 60 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Michigan.

Grand Traverse Container-GR (116 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Grand Traverse Container-GR
Grand Traverse Container-GR (116 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Grand Traverse Container-GR has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 0.7 5 0 0
2022 2.2 0.0 3 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 3 0 0
2020 3.0 1.0 3 0 0
2019 7.6 6.7 8 0 0
2018 36.6 27.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · MI · Grand Rapids

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fluted Partition 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9YD Leaman Container Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Star Corrugated 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSC Atlanta 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad Electronics, Inc. 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louisiana-Pacific Newberry 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4650 Brownstown MI 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ash Stevens Riverview 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Gallo Construction Corp 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Piala's Nursery & Garden Shop, Inc 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S04417 - WM of Alameda County (WMAC) 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AIG Florida 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 124 - Walsh - Flour Design Build Team 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Corporate Office 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loffredo Fresh Foods 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xtreme Elements LLC 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.