Airports, civil, operation and maintenance · Georgia

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field

Peachtree City, GA · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airports, civil, operation and maintenance workplace, earning a grade C.

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Airports, civil, operation and maintenance BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field safety composite

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field held a steady TCR band

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Peachtree City, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/40
  • PHOTO Air General - Home O…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Air General - Home Office (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Airports, civil, operation and maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field falls in its industry

1,555 Airports, civil, operation and establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 40 Airports, civil, operation and employers in Georgia.

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field (31 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field
Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field (31 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Atlanta Regional Airfield- Falcon Field has fewer employees than the Airports, civil, operation and maintenan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · GA · Peachtree City

1,555 Airports, civil, operation and maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 83 employers in Peachtree City, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Air General - Home Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR KYLOA - UPSCO GLOBAL OPERATIONS CENTER 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swissport - HQA - HQA 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9095-HDQ 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wade Plantation LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clover Leaf Gin Inc. Georgia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Birdsong Peanuts Arlington Georgia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton GA 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. - Peachtree City (PTCGA) 4,488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. 3,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osmose Utilities Service, Inc. 3,072 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Lighting Peachtree City 843 FTE
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ahner Fabricating & Sheet Metal, Inc 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Hammond 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydradyne LLC 300 - Harvey 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Sales of Hutchinson, Inc. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.