Erecting structural steel · Georgia

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc.

Smyrna, GA · ~65 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Erecting structural steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc.: 3.3 TCR = 119% of Erecting structural steel BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. safety composite

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. injury rate improved

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.9 from 2.7 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Smyrna, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/19
  • PHOTO DIAMOND STEEL CONSTR…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DIAMOND STEEL CONSTRUCTION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. averages 3.3 TCR (119% of the Erecting structural steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. falls in its industry

705 Erecting structural steel establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 19 Erecting structural steel employers in Georgia.

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc.
Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. (65 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. has more employees than the Erecting structural steel median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2021 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.2 3.9 4 0 0
2019 3.6 1.2 3 0 0
2018 7.2 4.3 5 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · GA · Smyrna

705 Erecting structural steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 102 employers in Smyrna, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DIAMOND STEEL CONSTRUCTION 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KAS Construction Consultants,LLC 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interstate Reinforcing Steel 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bake's Steel Erectors, Inc. 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbia Farms of GA 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Lake City, FL 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Peanut Ingredients, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE C & E INVESTORS & CONSTRUCTION LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DAT1 1,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesley Brown International 1,086 FTE
CITY-NEAR UCB Smyrna 1,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smyrna 819 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Manufacturing Company PA 350 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR General Shale Tri Cities Block 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FoodTown #006 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Utc #507 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amstar of Western New York Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferguson Construction Company - Dayton 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.