Plasma process metal cutting machines (except welding equipment) manufacturing · Nevada

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno

Reno, NV · ~65 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Plasma process metal cutting machines (except welding equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Plasma process metal cutting machines (except welding equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno safety composite

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2019→2024

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno injury rate improved

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno's TCR fell 2.6 from 4.1 in 2019 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Reno, NV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P72
  • PHOTO Weiss-Aug East Hanover
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Weiss-Aug East Hanover (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Plasma process metal cutting machines (except welding equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno TCR series: 2019=4.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno falls in its industry

391 Plasma process metal cutting m establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno (65 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno
The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno (65 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

The Lincoln Electric Company - Reno has more employees than the Plasma process metal cutting machines (e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.7 1.6 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · NV · Reno

391 Plasma process metal cutting machines (except welding equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 611 employers in Reno, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Weiss-Aug East Hanover 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gleason Works 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KPM Herkules USA 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferguson Perforating Co. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tripp Enterprises Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Momeni Construction, INC. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSW Framing 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frehner Masonry 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Univeristy of Nevada, Reno 7,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Reno 7,096 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Hospital 3,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renown Regional Medical Center 200 3,582 FTE
NAT-TCR Raccoon Service Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashville Motor Division 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Foti Contracting LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trucare Living Centers - Columbus 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Steel Erectors, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utc #507 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amstar of Western New York Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferguson Construction Company - Dayton 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.