Annealing metals and metal products for the trade · Michigan

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett

Lansing, MI · ~32 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Annealing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett safety composite

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2021→2024

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett injury rate improved

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.4 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/43
  • PHOTO Paulo - Cleveland
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Paulo - Cleveland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atmosphere Annealing Bassett averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett TCR series: 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Atmosphere Annealing Bassett falls in its industry

248 Annealing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 43 Annealing metals and metal pro employers in Michigan.

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett (32 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Atmosphere Annealing Bassett
Atmosphere Annealing Bassett (32 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Atmosphere Annealing Bassett has fewer employees than the Annealing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.3 6.2 3 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · MI · Lansing

248 Annealing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Paulo - Cleveland 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Heat Treat, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Astro Aluminum Treating Co., Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zion Industries Valley City 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6801_15743 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Soil Dairy 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berrybrook 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Tawas 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR double kwik West Liberty 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Camarillo Senior Living 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenthumb Environmental Beautification Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schofield Farms LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelly Materials, Inc. - Liquid Division 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jordan Valley Medical Center - EVS 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake City Medical Center - EVS 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.