Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Camarillo Senior Living

Laguna Niguel, CA · ~7,947 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Camarillo Senior Living runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Camarillo Senior Living: 4.0 TCR = 104% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Camarillo Senior Living safety composite

Camarillo Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Camarillo Senior Living: 1.0 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 8.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.34× in 2024

Camarillo Senior Living's TCR rose 5.1 from 1.0 in 2021 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Laguna Niguel, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 104% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #23/216
  • PHOTO The Preserve
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~7,947 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Preserve (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Camarillo Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Camarillo Senior Living averages 4.0 TCR (104% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Camarillo Senior Living TCR series: 2021=1 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.8

Where Camarillo Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Camarillo Senior Living (7,947 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Camarillo Senior Living
Camarillo Senior Living (7,947 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Camarillo Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 5.3 7 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 8.8 6.8 4 5 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Laguna Niguel

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Laguna Niguel, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Preserve 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Springs at Sunnyview 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Terrace of Belmont 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village LP - Coral Gables 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian 8,071 FTE
STATE-SIZE UC Santa Cruz 8,081 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Atomics 8,108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0690 - LAGUNA MARKETPLACE CA WHSE 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2206 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0028 - LAGUNA NIGUEL CA WHSE 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR CANUS Services, Inc. 266 FTE
NAT-TCR Greenthumb Environmental Beautification Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR double kwik West Liberty 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atmosphere Annealing Bassett 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE UW Medical Center Montlake 7,958 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Methodist Hospital - Texas Medical Center 7,983 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grady Health System 7,888 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.