Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Atria Sierra Pointe

Scottsdale, AZ · ~107 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atria Sierra Pointe runs at 248% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Atria Sierra Pointe: 9.4 TCR = 248% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atria Sierra Pointe safety composite

Atria Sierra Pointe scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Atria Sierra Pointe: 9.7 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 14.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Atria Sierra Pointe's TCR rose 1.5 from 9.7 in 2016 to 11.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Scottsdale, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 248% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #97/173
  • PHOTO AltaVita Independent…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AltaVita Independent Living LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Atria Sierra Pointe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atria Sierra Pointe averages 9.4 TCR (248% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atria Sierra Pointe TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=11.7 · 2019=14.8 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=11.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Atria Sierra Pointe falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #97 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Atria Sierra Pointe (107 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Atria Sierra Pointe
Atria Sierra Pointe (107 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Atria Sierra Pointe has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.3 0.0 7 0 0
2021 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2020 5.9 5.9 2 2 0
2019 14.8 9.5 14 0 0
2017 11.7 5.3 9 2 0
2016 9.7 2.2 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Scottsdale

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AltaVita Independent Living LLC 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Southwood 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodland Terrace of Danville 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10301 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turkey Creek 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeport McMoran Exploration 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE 502 Office Building 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Younger Brothers Construction Co., Inc. 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Scottsdale 4,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS 2,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Milford Place 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 545182-Mar-Main Office Sta 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 401120-Brookings Po 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 406769-Por-Parkrose Sta 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE USM Store #677 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pontiac 38630 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fought and Company, Inc 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kellington Construction Inc. 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.