Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Maple Valley Dementia Care

Mcminnville, OR · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Valley Dementia Care runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Maple Valley Dementia Care: 11.6 TCR = 305% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Valley Dementia Care safety composite

Maple Valley Dementia Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.7

2017→2024

Maple Valley Dementia Care injury rate improved

Maple Valley Dementia Care's TCR fell 10.7 from 24.1 in 2017 to 13.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 24.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=24.1 · 2018=22.6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=12.8 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=13.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mcminnville, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 305% of ind

  • DART 13.4 DART
  • RANK #133/218
  • PHOTO Waltonwood Cary Park…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waltonwood Cary Parkway AL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Maple Valley Dementia Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Valley Dementia Care averages 11.6 TCR (305% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Valley Dementia Care TCR series: 2017=24.1 · 2018=22.6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=12.8 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=13.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Maple Valley Dementia Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #133 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Maple Valley Dementia Care (44 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Valley Dementia Care
Maple Valley Dementia Care (44 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Maple Valley Dementia Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.4 13.4 4 0 0
2023 0.2 0.0 5 1 0
2022 6.9 6.9 2 0 0
2021 6.8 6.8 1 1 0
2020 12.8 3.2 4 0 0
2019 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2018 22.6 0.0 8 0 0
2017 24.1 3.4 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Mcminnville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 94 employers in Mcminnville, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Cary Parkway AL 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atrium at Serenity Pointe 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Poland Way 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isle at Raider Ranch 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Snake River Produce Co., LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE KG Farms, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACW Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Wolf Vineyards, Inc 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Linfield College 943 FTE
CITY-NEAR WILLAMETTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Steel Rolling Mills 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSS McMinnville 397 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0085 Glendale 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dept. of Public Works 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bulwark Construction, Inc. 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ILC033 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Davcon Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Mechanical Services Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gosiger Machine Tools, LLC, Cypress, CA 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Concrete Corp. 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.