Industrial building (except warehouses) construction · Virginia

AT&T Mobility

Reston, VA · ~259 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AT&T Mobility runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction workplace, earning a grade A.

AT&T Mobility: 0.4 TCR = 14% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AT&T Mobility safety composite

AT&T Mobility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

AT&T Mobility injury rate improved

AT&T Mobility's TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Reston, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/22
  • PHOTO Infrastructure US Of…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Infrastructure US Offices (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

AT&T Mobility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AT&T Mobility averages 0.4 TCR (14% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AT&T Mobility TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where AT&T Mobility falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 22 Industrial building (except wa employers in Virginia.

AT&T Mobility (259 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AT&T Mobility
AT&T Mobility (259 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

AT&T Mobility has more employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2019 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2016 0.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · VA · Reston

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 93 employers in Reston, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Infrastructure US Offices 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bechtel Equipment Operations (BEO) Texas 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR All other locations Decatur AL 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mr. Grant Contr. inc. 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strongwell_Bristol 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Tysons Corner 115 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 5880 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reston Hospital Center 1,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Security Solutions 1,061 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aleut Federal, LLC (ALL PERSONNEL - ALL SUBSIDIARIES) 938 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stanley Martin Homes, LLC 827 FTE
NAT-TCR Bechtel Equipment Operations (BEO) Texas 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kaufman Lynn Construction 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR R.A.D. Fabrication, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KnowBe4, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE FV Medical Transportation 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Airways Corporation 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Georgia System Operations Corporation 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Castle Park 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.