Alpine skiing facilities without accommodations · New Hampshire

Attitash Mountain Resort

Name: Attitash Mountain Resort Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Bartlett, NH · ~286 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 14.2
Avg TCR: 3.1
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Attitash Mountain Resort runs at 458% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Alpine skiing facilities without accommodations workplace, earning a grade F.

Attitash Mountain Resort: 14.2 TCR = 458% of Alpine skiing facilities without accommodations BLS 3.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Attitash Mountain Resort safety composite

Attitash Mountain Resort scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 14.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers
DART rate: F 10.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Attitash Mountain Resort: 12.8 → 15.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 15.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2018

Attitash Mountain Resort's TCR rose 2.8 from 12.8 in 2016 to 15.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713920 · Bartlett, NH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.2 · 458% of ind

DART 10.8 DART
RANK #9/9
PHOTO Catamount Developmen…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 48 inj
SIZE ~286 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Catamount Development Corporation (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

GRANITE PEAK C

14.5
Catamount Deve

14.4
This site

14.2
Loveland Ski A

13.9
Clear Creek Sk

13.9

What this shows Attitash Mountain Resort averages 14.2 TCR (458% of the Alpine skiing facilities without accommodations BLS benchmark).

Attitash Mountain Resort TCR series: 2016=12.8 · 2018=15.6 · BLS 3.1

Where Attitash Mountain Resort falls in its industry

121 Alpine skiing facilities witho establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.6.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Alpine skiing facilities witho employers in New Hampshire.

Attitash Mountain Resort (286 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 9.6

Attitash Mountain Resort has more employees than the Alpine skiing facilities without accommo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	15.6	10.8	23	0	0
2016	12.8	10.2	25	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713920 · NH · Bartlett

121 Alpine skiing facilities without accommodations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Catamount Development Corporation	SOUTH EGREMONT, MA	14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Loveland Ski Area	GEORGETOWN, CO	13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Clear Creek Skiing Corporation	GEORGETOWN, CO	13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	GRANITE PEAK CORP	WAUSAU, WI	14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Market Basket #47	RINDGE	286 FTE
STATE-SIZE	T. J. McCartney Inc.	NASHUA	287 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Market Basket #67	MANCHESTER	285 FTE
STATE-SIZE	NHLDR - NELC PRATT WHITNEY-10364	LONDONDERRY	285 FTE
CITY-NEAR	630 ATTITASH	Bartlett	266 FTE
NAT-TCR	Lindus Construction/Midwest Leafguard	Baldwin, WI	14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Garden Terrace Healthcare	Federal Way, WA	14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Harston Hall	Flourtown, PA	14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	NEW Cooperative Inc. - Pierson	Pierson, IA	14.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Clover Health Care	Auburn, ME	286 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Nestle Waters North America Allentown East (NPL)	Breinigsville, PA	286 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Colgate Tennessee	Morristown, TN	286 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Skanska Burns McDonnell ECCO - CPV Valley	Middletown, NY	286 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.