Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Auberge at Benbrook Lake

Fort Worth, TX · ~59 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Auberge at Benbrook Lake runs at 509% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Auberge at Benbrook Lake: 19.3 TCR = 509% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Auberge at Benbrook Lake safety composite

Auberge at Benbrook Lake scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 28.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Auberge at Benbrook Lake: 21.1 → 28.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 28.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.49× in 2022

Auberge at Benbrook Lake's TCR rose 7.6 from 21.1 in 2019 to 28.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.3 · 509% of ind

  • DART 28.7 DART
  • RANK #456/470
  • PHOTO Clearwater Springs A…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clearwater Springs Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Auberge at Benbrook Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Auberge at Benbrook Lake averages 19.3 TCR (509% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Auberge at Benbrook Lake TCR series: 2019=21.1 · 2020=15 · 2021=12.5 · 2022=28.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Auberge at Benbrook Lake falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #456 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Auberge at Benbrook Lake (59 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Auberge at Benbrook Lake
Auberge at Benbrook Lake (59 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Auberge at Benbrook Lake has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 28.7 28.7 1 5 0
2021 12.5 9.4 2 2 0
2020 15.0 5.0 2 4 0
2019 21.1 10.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Fort Worth

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clearwater Springs Assisted Living 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthology of the Plaza 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY SPLIT ROCK OPERATION LLC 19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10088 19.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Omega Protein INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Plainview SPSC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beckville Mine 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG - T.H. Wharton 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Clearwater Springs Assisted Living 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Symphony at The Tillers 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisville Jefferson County Metro Govt - Parks & Recreation - Cherokee Park 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Place Supportive Living- Alton 19.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG292 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Congdon Park Elementary 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG609 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG638 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.