Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Michigan

Auburn Hills Manufacturing

Auburn Hills, MI · ~177 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Auburn Hills Manufacturing runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade C.

Auburn Hills Manufacturing: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Auburn Hills Manufacturing safety composite

Auburn Hills Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2017→2024

Auburn Hills Manufacturing injury rate improved

Auburn Hills Manufacturing's TCR fell 3.9 from 5.2 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=7.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #8/21
  • PHOTO MacLean - Saegertown…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MacLean - Saegertown, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Auburn Hills Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Auburn Hills Manufacturing averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Auburn Hills Manufacturing TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=7.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=2 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Auburn Hills Manufacturing falls in its industry

241 Forgings made from purchased i establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 21 Forgings made from purchased i employers in Michigan.

Auburn Hills Manufacturing (177 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Auburn Hills Manufacturing
Auburn Hills Manufacturing (177 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Auburn Hills Manufacturing has more employees than the Forgings made from purchased iron or ste median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 3 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 2 0 0
2022 2.7 1.1 5 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 4 0 0
2020 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 7.6 3.8 9 1 0
2017 5.2 4.2 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · MI · Auburn Hills

241 Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MacLean - Saegertown, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Herbert E. Orr Company 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritor 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swagelok Impaction 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Godwin Plulmbing INC 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hood Container Grand Rapids 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Techniplas US LLC 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hi-Tech Mold & Engineering Inc 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Usc Norris Comprehensive Cance 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mondelez Global Great Lakes - Sales 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Coast Counties Peterbilt - San Jose 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HiLine 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Hignell Companies 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE PnP Admin - Sacramento 2 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quakertown East 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Micro Control Company 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.