Testing Laboratories · Michigan

FCA US Headquarters and Technology

Auburn Hills, MI · ~12,609 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FCA US Headquarters and Technology runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Testing Laboratories workplace, earning a grade A.

FCA US Headquarters and Technology: 0.2 TCR = 36% of Testing Laboratories BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FCA US Headquarters and Technology safety composite

FCA US Headquarters and Technology scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

FCA US Headquarters and Technology held a steady TCR band

FCA US Headquarters and Technology's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.2 in 2020 to 0.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.2 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #8/31
  • PHOTO Eberspaecher of the …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~12,609 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eberspaecher of the Americas - Novi Tech Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

FCA US Headquarters and Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FCA US Headquarters and Technology averages 0.2 TCR (36% of the Testing Laboratories BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FCA US Headquarters and Technology TCR series: 2020=0.2 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.2 · BLS 0.5

Where FCA US Headquarters and Technology falls in its industry

232 Testing Laboratories establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 31 Testing Laboratories employers in Michigan.

FCA US Headquarters and Technology (12,609 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate FCA US Headquarters and Technology
FCA US Headquarters and Technology (12,609 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

FCA US Headquarters and Technology has more employees than the Testing Laboratories median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.2 0.1 17 4 0
2022 0.2 0.1 15 7 0
2021 0.2 0.1 22 2 0
2020 0.2 0.2 22 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · MI · Auburn Hills

232 Testing Laboratories employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eberspaecher of the Americas - Novi Tech Center 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BCS-AIS Customer Center 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Engineering Center of Excellence 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Novi - Farmington Hills, MI 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2250-300 9,436 FTE
STATE-SIZE SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Auburn Hills North - Research, Test and Development (We do not manufacture) 1,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPAR Marketing Force, Inc 809 FTE
NAT-TCR Worley Field Services at ExxonMobil BCEP Project 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Philips Healthcare Informatics 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DLLSTX18 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PLANTXHS 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE University of Connecticut, Storrs 12,616 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon State University 12,573 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO002 12,691 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.