Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing · Michigan

Auburn Hills plant 36

Auburn Hills, MI · ~20 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Auburn Hills plant 36 runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing workplace, earning a grade D.

Auburn Hills plant 36: 5.2 TCR = 158% of Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Auburn Hills plant 36 safety composite

Auburn Hills plant 36 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2016→2022

Auburn Hills plant 36 injury rate improved

Auburn Hills plant 36's TCR fell 9.1 from 21.0 in 2016 to 11.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 21.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 2.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=21.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=11.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327320 · Auburn Hills, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 11.9 DART
  • RANK #23/43
  • PHOTO Algonquin Yard 285
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Algonquin Yard 285 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Auburn Hills plant 36 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Auburn Hills plant 36 averages 5.2 TCR (158% of the Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Auburn Hills plant 36 TCR series: 2016=21 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=11.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Auburn Hills plant 36 falls in its industry

1,316 Ready-mix concrete manufacturi establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 43 Ready-mix concrete manufacturi employers in Michigan.

Auburn Hills plant 36 (20 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Auburn Hills plant 36
Auburn Hills plant 36 (20 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Auburn Hills plant 36 has fewer employees than the Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and dis median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.9 11.9 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 21.0 15.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327320 · MI · Auburn Hills

1,316 Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Algonquin Yard 285 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hi-Grade Materials-Thousand Palms Ready Mix 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ernst Concrete Plant 41 Sugarcreek 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEST COLUMBIA 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tholrund Brothers 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indeck Niles Energy Center 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan Solar Solutions West 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR 056756-San Carlos Po 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 052388-El Centro Po 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 306646-Omaha Ne P&Dc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 566640-Plymouth Po 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Metals Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Patz & Hall Winery 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 541638-Colville Po 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE 548331-Tacoma Wa Vmf 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.