Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Georgia

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing

Thomson, GA · ~106 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing: 4.1 TCR = 125% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing safety composite

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing: 1.7 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing's TCR rose 4.3 from 1.7 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Thomson, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 125% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #9/13
  • PHOTO AZZ Galvanizing - Lo…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AZZ Galvanizing - Louisville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Augusta Coating and Manufacturing averages 4.1 TCR (125% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=6 · BLS 3.3

Where Augusta Coating and Manufacturing falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 13 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Georgia.

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing (106 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Augusta Coating and Manufacturing
Augusta Coating and Manufacturing (106 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Augusta Coating and Manufacturing has more employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 3.6 5 0 0
2023 4.1 4.1 4 0 0
2022 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2021 7.3 3.1 6 1 0
2020 3.7 2.4 3 0 0
2019 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2018 4.7 3.4 7 0 0
2017 4.9 3.3 6 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · GA · Thomson

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 30 employers in Thomson, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Louisville 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Coating Alabama, LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minnesota 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR V&S Delaware Galvanizing LLC 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mercier Orchards 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canon Egg Farm 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMITH DOUGLAS H 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structural Steel Erector 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 22 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 16 - Thomson, GA 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Auto Parts DC 16 363 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1658 278 FTE
NAT-TCR East Clinical 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Electric Power Assocation 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gabriel N. A. Distribution (Ride Control, LLC) 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Silverdale Office 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Legacy Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Propane 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE RI Office 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Classic at Hillcrest Greens 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.